Making sense of tennis data
Compare rates with attempt counts and streaks with dates and event scope. Choose serve, return, rally or research measures that answer the question at hand.
Algunos artículos se ofrecen en su idioma original. Cada enlace indica el idioma. 한국어 · English · 繁體中文
Comentar →
Publication and correction timeline
Source publication, publication on this site, updates and corrections for articles linked to this topic. These are not the times when matches or real-world events happened. Titles and links point to current article editions, not reconstructed historical drafts.
Shanghai completes Ruud’s quarterfinal set across all nine Masters events
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Shanghai completes Ruud’s quarterfinal set across all nine Masters events
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Low-compression balls: better forehands today and learning over eight weeks
Added sample sizes, testing conditions, results and a practical progression record.
Same serve speed, different joint demands: the role of mass distribution
Added matched racket properties, serve selection, phase-specific results and demo criteria.
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Added the 64-team structure, team seeds, nationalities and score-reading examples.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Added round counts, an actual feeder branch and a practical reading sequence.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading WTA match notes: align the match date and the record
Added dated tournament material, concrete total and consecutive No. 1 examples, and uses for year-end and Race records.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Yastremska at the 2024 Australian Open: eight wins and a semifinal turning point
Added qualifying workload, quarterfinal turning points and semifinal break-point conversion.
Six weeks of training: what changed in starts and reactive movement
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Reading charted matches: serve direction and return-depth coverage
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Official rankings and Elo answer different questions
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Did an outward coaching cue still help two weeks later?
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Lehecka resistió cinco partidos sin ceder su saque. Sinner necesitó dos juegos al resto.
La final de Miami 2026 dejó 11 bolas de rotura, una ocasión de 0–40 y una lección: conservar el saque no siempre significa controlar el partido.
8 min de lectura
27 % de primeros saques, ningún punto de break: el set de Rybakina que no cabe en una sola cifra
Rybakina ganó 22 de 30 puntos al servicio en el primer set de la final del US Open 2026 pese a meter solo el 27 % de primeros. Falta mirar cómo esos puntos se convirtieron en juegos.
8 min de lecturaZverev ganó 39 de 42 puntos con el primer saque. No es una estadística de aces
El dominio inicial de Alexander Zverev al servicio frente a Ben Shelton en la final del US Open 2026 explica por qué el porcentaje de primeros, los aces y los puntos ganados cuentan historias distintas.
8 min de lectura
Ningún título grande. Un 72,5 % de victorias en sets decisivos. ¿Cómo recordar a Nishikori?
La despedida de Kei Nishikori recuperó una estadística extraordinaria en sets decisivos. Merece atención y una lectura más cuidadosa que «siempre ganaba los puntos importantes».
8 min de lectura
Por qué Iga Świątek agradeció los intercambios largos en Pekín
Świątek dijo que los intercambios prolongados de su debut en Pekín la ayudaron a sentir la pista y la pelota. Qué pueden aprender los jugadores experimentados antes de culpar al cordaje por unas condiciones desconocidas.
7 min de lectura