Making sense of tennis data
Compare rates with attempt counts and streaks with dates and event scope. Choose serve, return, rally or research measures that answer the question at hand.
Alcuni articoli sono disponibili in lingua originale. La lingua è indicata su ogni link. 한국어 · English · 繁體中文
Discutine →
Publication and correction timeline
Source publication, publication on this site, updates and corrections for articles linked to this topic. These are not the times when matches or real-world events happened. Titles and links point to current article editions, not reconstructed historical drafts.
Shanghai completes Ruud’s quarterfinal set across all nine Masters events
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Low-compression balls: better forehands today and learning over eight weeks
Added sample sizes, testing conditions, results and a practical progression record.
Same serve speed, different joint demands: the role of mass distribution
Added matched racket properties, serve selection, phase-specific results and demo criteria.
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Added the 64-team structure, team seeds, nationalities and score-reading examples.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Added round counts, an actual feeder branch and a practical reading sequence.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading WTA match notes: align the match date and the record
Added dated tournament material, concrete total and consecutive No. 1 examples, and uses for year-end and Race records.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Yastremska at the 2024 Australian Open: eight wins and a semifinal turning point
Added qualifying workload, quarterfinal turning points and semifinal break-point conversion.
Six weeks of training: what changed in starts and reactive movement
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Reading charted matches: serve direction and return-depth coverage
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Official rankings and Elo answer different questions
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Did an outward coaching cue still help two weeks later?
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Miami 2026 semifinals: Sinner’s tiebreak and Lehecka’s return pressure
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Lehecka non aveva perso il servizio per cinque partite. A Sinner sono bastati due turni.
La finale di Miami 2026, gli 11 break point e il mancato recupero da 0–40: cosa distingue tenere il servizio dal controllare davvero il gioco.
8 minuti di lettura
27% di prime, nessuna palla break: il set di Rybakina che un numero solo non spiega
Nel primo set della finale US Open 2026, Rybakina vinse 22 punti su 30 al servizio pur mettendo appena il 27% di prime. Per capirlo bisogna ricostruire come i punti diventano game.
8 minuti di letturaZverev ha vinto 39 punti su 42 con la prima. Non è una statistica sugli ace
Il dominio iniziale di Alexander Zverev al servizio contro Ben Shelton nella finale dello US Open 2026 spiega perché percentuale di prime, ace e punti vinti raccontano cose diverse.
8 minuti di lettura
Nessun titolo Slam. Il 72,5% di vittorie nei set decisivi. Come ricordare Nishikori?
L’addio di Kei Nishikori ha riportato alla luce una statistica straordinaria nei set decisivi. Merita attenzione e una lettura più precisa di «vinceva sempre i punti importanti».
8 minuti di lettura
Perché Iga Świątek ha apprezzato gli scambi lunghi a Pechino
Świątek ha detto che gli scambi prolungati all’esordio a Pechino l’hanno aiutata a sentire campo e palla. Che cosa può impararne un giocatore esperto prima di attribuire alle corde condizioni poco familiari.
7 minuti di lettura