Building a doubles partnership
Plan serving, receiving, net movement and partner communication together. Use tour partnerships and mixed doubles to examine how contrasting strengths combine.
Einige Artikel sind in ihrer Originalsprache verfügbar. Die Sprache steht am jeweiligen Link. 한국어 · English · 繁體中文
Darüber diskutieren →
Publication and correction timeline
Source publication, publication on this site, updates and corrections for articles linked to this topic. These are not the times when matches or real-world events happened. Titles and links point to current article editions, not reconstructed historical drafts.
When can a doubles team change its serving order?
Clarified the service-let exception when a serve touches the net assembly before a receiver, including which serve is repeated.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Agree a practice format when serves are still developing
Specified first-ball, positioning and rotation agreements, then a progression from feeds to actual serves.
Cabral and Tracy recover from 3–5 in the decider to reach Shanghai final
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Cabral and Tracy recover from 3–5 in the decider to reach Shanghai final
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
A 59-minute final ends a 13-match streak: Dabrowski and Stefani win Beijing
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
A 59-minute final ends a 13-match streak: Dabrowski and Stefani win Beijing
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Dabrowski and Stefani win Wuhan for a third consecutive tournament title
The source publication date recorded for this article. It does not mean that every linked source below was published on this date.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Dabrowski and Stefani win Wuhan for a third consecutive tournament title
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Dabrowski and Stefani win Wuhan for a third consecutive tournament title
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Davis Cup Final 8: why a team result can read 2–1
The source publication date recorded for this article. It does not mean that every linked source below was published on this date.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Davis Cup Final 8: why a team result can read 2–1
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 2
A down-the-line doubles return needs a next-ball plan
Expanded the reason for central coverage, the cross-court comparison and a four-player next-ball drill.
Sources linked to this article · 2
When can a doubles team change its serving order?
Added a four-player sequence, fixed receiving sides, new-set choices and partner-contact rulings.
Sources linked to this article · 2
No breaks, then 11-9: alternates Droguet and Jacquet win Estoril
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
No breaks, then 11-9: alternates Droguet and Jacquet win Estoril
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Goffin’s Brussels farewell plan: two wildcards and a Friday hall change
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Goffin’s Brussels farewell plan: two wildcards and a Friday hall change
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Korean under-12 boys beat Romania 2-1 for third straight semifinal
Added all three tie scores, previous editions, the girls’ result and the next matchups.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Five wins without a dropped set: Miedler and Oberleitner take Shanghai
The source publication date recorded for this article. It does not mean that every linked source below was published on this date.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Five wins without a dropped set: Miedler and Oberleitner take Shanghai
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Siniakova und Patten schlugen Sabalenka und Djokovic. Das nächste Match passt nicht ins einfache Bild.
Ein 10:2 im Match-Tiebreak warf die topgesetzten Stars aus dem US-Open-Mixed. Die spätere 8:10-Niederlage zeigt, warum Siniakovas und Pattens Tag mehr war als Doppel gegen Einzel.
8 Minuten Lesezeit
5:0 war noch nicht das Ende: die Williams-Schwestern und ein trügerischer Tiebreak-Vorsprung
Serena und Venus Williams führten im entscheidenden Tiebreak der US Open 2026 mit 5:0 und verloren ihn 7:10. Ihr Doppel-Comeback zeigt, wie viel Arbeit auch bei klarer Führung noch bleibt.
8 Minuten LesezeitSie rufen Ihrem Doppelpartner „Zurück!“ zu. Warum kann das den Punkt kosten?
Das USTA-Beispiel eines zu kurzen Lobs erklärt, wann Doppelkommunikation zur absichtlichen Behinderung wird, weshalb eine verspätete Reklamation scheitert und warum Stöhnen und unwillkürliche Schreie anders behandelt werden.
8 Minuten Lesezeit
Siniaková und Townsend: Muss Ihr Doppelpartner so spielen wie Sie?
Nach ihrem Roland-Garros-Titel 2026 hob Kateřina Siniaková hervor, wie anders Taylor Townsend spielt. Die nützliche Lehre betrifft gemeinsame Möglichkeiten, nicht bloß das Zusammenbringen von Gegensätzen.
7 Minuten Lesezeit
US-Open-Halbfinale, dann Rücktritt: Warum Joe Salisbury aufhörte
Joe Salisbury beendete mit 34 seine Karriere nach einem letzten US-Open-Halbfinale mit Rajeev Ram. Sein Bericht trennt Wettbewerbsfähigkeit vom Wunsch nach einer weiteren Saison auf Tour.
8 Minuten Lesezeit