Making sense of tennis data
Compare rates with attempt counts and streaks with dates and event scope. Choose serve, return, rally or research measures that answer the question at hand.
Některé články jsou k dispozici v původním jazyce. Jazyk je uveden u každého odkazu. 한국어 · English · 繁體中文
Diskutovat →
Publication and correction timeline
Source publication, publication on this site, updates and corrections for articles linked to this topic. These are not the times when matches or real-world events happened. Titles and links point to current article editions, not reconstructed historical drafts.
Shanghai completes Ruud’s quarterfinal set across all nine Masters events
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Low-compression balls: better forehands today and learning over eight weeks
Added sample sizes, testing conditions, results and a practical progression record.
Same serve speed, different joint demands: the role of mass distribution
Added matched racket properties, serve selection, phase-specific results and demo criteria.
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Shelbayh wins 28 of 37 first-serve points to defeat Boyer
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Fery, Basavareddy, Boyer and Basing: Stanford’s September Top 300 quartet
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Added the 64-team structure, team seeds, nationalities and score-reading examples.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open doubles draw: two names, one team
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Added round counts, an actual feeder branch and a practical reading sequence.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Reading the 2026 US Open singles draw: from 128 players to the final
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 3
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Two breaks each: Vacherot wins the tiebreak and the Tokyo comeback
Updated Korean names and terminology, wording or event context where applicable.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Reading WTA match notes: align the match date and the record
Added dated tournament material, concrete total and consecutive No. 1 examples, and uses for year-end and Race records.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Yastremska at the 2024 Australian Open: eight wins and a semifinal turning point
Added qualifying workload, quarterfinal turning points and semifinal break-point conversion.
Six weeks of training: what changed in starts and reactive movement
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Reading charted matches: serve direction and return-depth coverage
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 2
Official rankings and Elo answer different questions
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Did an outward coaching cue still help two weeks later?
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Miami 2026 semifinals: Sinner’s tiebreak and Lehecka’s return pressure
The date this site published the article, separate from the date of a match, study or event it discusses.
Sources linked to this article · 1
Lehecka held serve for five matches. Sinner broke him in his second service game.
Lehecka’s 2026 Miami run ended against Sinner, but the useful story lies in 11 break points, a missed 0–40 chance and the difference between holding and controlling.
8 min read
Rybakina’s 22 of 30: how a shaky first serve became a held set
The 2026 US Open final began with 22/30 service points won and no break points faced. Use scoring examples and a practical log to understand the difference.
7 min readZverev won 39 of 42 first-serve points. That is not an ace statistic
Alexander Zverev’s early service dominance against Ben Shelton in the 2026 US Open final shows why first-serve percentage, aces and points won tell different stories.
8 min read
Nishikori’s deciding-set record and a nineteen-year career
Twelve ATP singles titles, forty top-ten wins and a historic major final: read Nishikori’s Tokyo farewell through opponents, stages and record scope.
6 min read
Why Iga Świątek welcomed the long rallies in Beijing
Świątek said the extended rallies in her Beijing opener helped her feel the court and ball. What experienced players can learn before blaming unfamiliar conditions on their strings.
7 min read